If have seen examples of UFS getting updated same day because a lab tech ran into some problem. These tools are often updated based on real world cases.
Many pros in this group recommend for example GetDataBack, or UFS or ReclaiMe based on results on real world scenarios. I didn't test GetDataBack but I know some like it based on results. Back then I didn't test DMDE but that tool keeps surprising me in a positive way, specially because it's so flexible. Good: ReclaiMe, R-Studio, File Scavenger, ZAR (and iRecover back then), UFS Explorer.
Their honey pot articles on their website are often nonsense and their sole purpose is SEO and lurking people in. Many people use those because they make sure their tools are spammed everywhere. I mean I have tested DiskDrill against healthy drives and it still missed a significant portion of the data, and data it did find was RAW (so not in folder structure).Īnother big problem I have with all of the above is their marketing. Since then I every now and then test DiskDrill, RecoverIt if they come out with new versions.īiggest disappointments then, and still today are RecoverIt, DiskDrill and Stellar. I have looked at a lot of these, I took about every file recovery I could lay hands on and tested then against several real world drives I had. Maybe I will add some comparisons for real world cases. I've been working up a write-up about criteria of various data recovery products, what to watch for, why they aren't created equal. All that being said, there are many things that it just doesn't do a good job recovering from. They aren't quite as bad with the spam in recent years, and they do encourage users to not run their products on damaged drives. I have mixed feelings about Stellar software. I could practically write it down and seal it in an envelope, the person used EaseUs. People post here talking about how their files were recovered "broken", directory contents are jumbled together, files that are shown to be intact are recovered empty. The product is also stupidly, ungodly, unjustifiably slow. EaseUs / Wondershare / Stellar buy reviews too, but at least they kind-of workĭisk Drill also strongly suggests their product can be used directly in damaged drives. They run a very well tuned marketing and review bombing machine that keeps them in business and lets them carry on. Outright, legitimate scam with no redeeming qualities. What they encourage is reckless and harmful, and any company that does that should be buried.ĭr.
On top of that, many of them (for sure EaseUs and Wondershare) advertise their products for cases in which they’re knowingly damaging people’s data and putting it at risk, such as in the case of a clicking or dropped drive. Disk Drill, EaseUs, Wondershare and Stellar all are on the bottom end of this result quality spectrum.
This is due to differences in the way they interpret what they find, the nitty gritty of which I couldn’t describe. Given the exact same starting data, two different tools can recover a different result. In all other cases, it tends to perform worse than other tools. Disk Drill really does have a time and a place where it’s useful, and that’s when restoring damaged Time Machine volumes.
0 kommentar(er)
